Friends of the San Juans asks you to endorse immediate extension of mandatory tug escort for laden oil tankers entering the now-unprotected first 70 miles of the Strait of Juan de Fuca.

"If a two-tug escort is important protection for Puget Sound and Prince William Sound, why isn’t it a good idea for the Strait of Juan de Fuca?"
-- Editorial, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, May 14, 1998

"Tug escorts and a rescue tug have been required in Prince William Sound since the devastating Exxon Valdez spill; those measures reduce the risk of another spill there by 75 percent. Is the state of Washington supposed to wait until it has its own disaster before tugs are required?"
-- Editorial, Tacoma News Tribune, June 22, 1998

"The escort vessels are to assist a ship that becomes disabled from a loss of propulsion or steering control; the immediate presence of the escort vessels will reduce its chances of colliding or running aground."
-- U.S. Coast Guard, 59 Federal Register 65741, December 21, 1994

"… the Coast Guard-sponsored Volpe Study of maritime hazards … conclude[d] that groundings and collisions pose the greatest threat and that additional spill protection is needed in the north Puget Sound area."
-- Sen. Patty Murray and Rep. Jack Metcalf, letter to Vice President Gore, June 10, 1998

"While oil spills may be longshots, and something most of us don’t spend much time thinking about, it is certainly a case in which it is better to be safe than sorry. Despite what may be a small chance of disaster, we should do more to protect our waterways."
-- Editorial, Port Angeles Daily News, May 8, 1998

"The state of Washington welcomes the opportunity to work closely with the Administration over the next year or two to evaluate the effectiveness of the International Tug of Opportunity System [ITOS] and to establish more comprehensive and effective long-term improvements in our system for oil spill protection.

However, I must convey my concern about the need for improved safety measures while these reviews are underway."
-- Gov. Gary Locke, letter to Vice President Gore, July 6, 1998

"A large spill in the shared waters [of Washington and British Columbia] is highly likely within 20 years. If such a spill occurs, there will be extensive losses of plants and wildlife, commercial and recreational uses, and property values."
-
- The Shared Marine Waters of British Columbia and Washington,
British Columbia / Washington Marine Science Panel, August 1994

"The state must guard against complacency and losing focus on spill prevention. *** The outer coast, the Strait of Juan de Fuca and the vicinity surrounding the state’s major refineries are the areas at greatest risk of major spills."
-
- Oil Spills in Washington State: A Historical Analysis,
            Washington epartment of Ecology, April 1997

"If a laden tanker loses steerage coming in the now-unprotected 70 mile stretch from the "J" buoy to Port Angeles, nearly any combination of tides and winds would undoubtedly drive the oil spill into the inland waters of the Puget Sound causing unimaginable destruction to the marine ecosystem."
-- Rep. Jack Metcalf, letter to Secretary of Transportation Slater, June 1, 1998

Why We in the San Juan Islands are Concerned

The San Juans lie in the path of the most common type of spill  3
that releases the greatest volume 4 of the most persistent and
destructive type of oil
5 in the area the State of Washington
identifies as at the greatest risk
6 for just such a tanker accident.

"Ultimately, the question is who bears the risk during an interim evaluation period – the environment and citizens of the Puget Sound area or the oil industry? Given the magnitude of the consequences associated with a major spill in the straits or Puget Sound, the answer should be clear."
-- Rep. Jack Metcalf and Sen. Patty Murray, letter to Vice President Gore, June 10, 1998